Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), mechanically recycled

2.3

Description

This process represents resin-specific environmental burdens associated with the production of secondary plastic pellets from post-consumer plastic scrap and used plastic products or packaging. The process includes a conservative estimate of 100 miles of transport of the waste plastic from location of discard (“curbside”), through locations of collection and to the recycling center. Within the recycling facility, washing, separation, granulation and pelletizing are modeled. This model applies mass allocation for the separation and cleaning of the mixed waste plastic, such that all plastics (PET, polypropylene, polystyrene), despite differing ease of separation, share the burdens of separation equally. The energy required for pelletization and compounding of the final plastic is specific to the polymer type, dependent on the material properties (specific heat and enthalpy of fusion) of the resin.

Impacts

Impact area MSI Score
Global Warming 0.9
Eutrophication 0.5
Water Scarcity 0.1
Abiotic Resource Depletion, Fossil Fuels 0.8
Chemistry
Scored per material rather than production stage. Click on "Return to Material", and learn about Chemistry scoring under "Chemistry Certifications".

Modeling Notes

Data submitted by thinkstep. Includes 5% loss of raw material to account for yield losses. Also includes 1000km inbound shipping distance to account for shipment of raw materials.

Meta information

  • Primary Source: GaBi 2014 Database, Service Pack 28, thinkstep AG, Leinfelden-Echterdingen
  • Last Publication or Review date: 2016
  • Geography: Global
  • Data Generator: thinkstep

Data quality

Data Quality Value Description
Precision Good 10% to 20% 2
Time Representativeness Excellent Data are not older than 4 years with respect to the release date or latest review date 1
Geographical Representativeness Excellent The processes included in the dataset are fully representative for the geography stated in the title and metadata 1
Technological Representativeness Fair The technologies modeled are representative of the average technology used for similar processes 3
Average 1.75