Polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic, mechanically recycled
2.4
Description
This process represents resin-specific environmental burdens associated with the production of secondary plastic pellets from post-consumer plastic scrap and used plastic products or packaging. The process includes a conservative estimate of 100 miles of transport of the waste plastic from location of discard (“curbside”), through locations of collection and to the recycling center. Within the recycling facility, washing, separation, granulation and pelletizing are modeled. This model applies mass allocation for the separation and cleaning of the mixed waste plastic, such that all plastics (PET, polypropylene, polystyrene), despite differing ease of separation, share the burdens of separation equally. The energy required for pelletization and compounding of the final plastic is specific to the polymer type, dependent on the material properties (specific heat and enthalpy of fusion) of the resin.
Impacts
| Impact area | MSI Score | |
|---|---|---|
| Global Warming | 0.9 | |
| Eutrophication | 0.5 | |
| Water Scarcity | 0.2 | |
| Abiotic Resource Depletion, Fossil Fuels | 0.8 | |
| Chemistry |
Scored per material rather than production stage. Click on "Return to Material", and learn about Chemistry scoring under "Chemistry Certifications".
|
Modeling Notes
Meta information
- Primary Source: GaBi 2014 Database, Service Pack 28, thinkstep AG, Leinfelden-Echterdingen
- Last Publication or Review date: 2016
- Geography: Global
- Data Generator: thinkstep
Data quality
| Data Quality | Value | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Precision | Good | 10% to 20% | 2 |
| Time Representativeness | Excellent | Data are not older than 4 years with respect to the release date or latest review date | 1 |
| Geographical Representativeness | Excellent | The processes included in the dataset are fully representative for the geography stated in the title and metadata | 1 |
| Technological Representativeness | Fair | The technologies modeled are representative of the average technology used for similar processes | 3 |
| Average | 1.75 | ||