Foam or Spray-Dry

2.5

Description

Foam or Spray-Dry finish is a process applied to textiles to impart different finish treatments, such as waterproofing, softening, antibacterial or anti-odor finishes. The process uses foamed air and a solution to apply the finishes, instead of the typical water bath used in pad or exhaust dry finishing processes. The process uses 50% less water, energy and chemicals as compared to the pad or exhaust finish technique. After the finishing solution has been imparted onto the textile, the textile is dried using heat and/or pressure. No curing stage is done. This process includes the chemical, water, and energy inputs. This process is the parent process for several different finishing treatments. It is assumed that multiple finishes may be applied in the solution bath, therefore the impacts of this stage are the same regardless of the number of finish treatments applied.

Impacts

Impact area MSI Score
Global Warming 0.8
Eutrophication 0.6
Water Scarcity 0.2
Abiotic Resource Depletion, Fossil Fuels 0.8
Chemistry
Scored per material rather than production stage. Click on "Return to Material", and learn about Chemistry scoring under "Chemistry Certifications".

Modeling Notes

Based on generic wet bath/curing process.

Meta information

  • Primary Source: van der Velden, Natascha M., Martin K. Patel, and Joost G. VogtlÃĪnder (2014). "LCA benchmarking study on textiles made of cotton, polyester, nylon, acryl, or elastane." The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 19.2: 331-356.
  • Last Publication or Review date: 2013
  • Geography: Global/generic
  • Data Generator: Cashion East, Pivot Analytics; east@pointpivot.com

Data quality

Data Quality Value Description
Precision Fair 20% to 30% 3
Time Representativeness Excellent Data are not older than 4 years with respect to the release date or latest review date 1
Geographical Representativeness Fair The processes included in the dataset are sufficiently representative for the geography stated in the title and metadata 3
Technological Representativeness Fair The technologies modeled are representative of the average technology used for similar processes 3
Average 2.5